Alternative lending is one of the hottest FinTech segments that attract attention from the corporate sector as a logical continuation and source of potential clients. It also serves to democratize financial services for those who don’t qualify for a bank loan. In addition, the terms and conditions of alternative lenders seem to be more attractive as they employ various models, bringing down the costs of service and ensuring the best offer.
However, alternative lending has certain downsides that are often not mentioned. Some short-term advantages of alternative lending options may turn to long-term disadvantages. One of the details a regular consumer doesn’t often notice because of the sophisticated product presentation is an APR. While short-term interest rates offered by alternative lenders seem extremely attractive, the annualized rate often exceeds 100%. Since such APRs are illegal to pass onto the consumers of a loan, alternative lenders may use a loophole, which avoids the classification of their product as a loan. In that case, the product and the interest rate can slip through the hands of the state and federal regulations.
The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has explored the matter and brought an example of the state of California, where the state lending law applies to installment loans. Still, it does not apply to cash advances, which are technically a purchase of future revenue for a fee.
The companies that don’t classify to be regulated choose to disclose their rates in cents charged per dollar borrowed instead of standard terms (APR). It covers the actual astronomical rate and makes it more difficult for individuals and businesses to estimate the potential expenses and compare with other options.
Getting on the hook with tailored to be attractive numbers, in the long-term, businesses often face the necessity to take another cash advances to finance the previous one. This practice is called stacking. Stacking is a sign that a particular business is facing cash flow challenges. The problem of stacking becomes apparent when a small business has to make several cash advancement payments a day, which may result in a quarter of their daily cash at the end of the day. An entrepreneur would logically look for another loan when the cash flow becomes overburdened with previous loans. At some point, the business wouldn’t be able to obtain a loan because upon assessment for approval; the cash flow problem will come up. In the most dramatic scenario, the business will have to be shut down due to insufficient cash flow and stacked loans.
Another problem with alternative lending is that these loans do not contribute positively to the credit score in some cases. Since cash advancement providers do not fall under the lens of a regulator, they are not obligated to report debts and repayments, which they sometimes don’t. WEF suggests an interesting reason for that – competition. Knowing that the list of borrowers can be purchased, alternative lenders do not wish to share their debt portfolio information because they know that the competitors may market their products to their customer base to stack the loans.
Some alternative lenders simply can’t report the debt and repayment information because their products are not classified as loans.
The lack of credit reporting is disadvantageous for borrowers and financial institutions. The first ones can’t improve their credit history even if they repay the loan promptly. The second ones don’t have access to the full information about the applicant that may have a good or bad credit history with an alternative lender. The problem is especially sharp when it comes to immigrants and their businesses. As they are often not qualified for a bank loan due to the lack of history with financial institutions in the country, they are forced to use the services of alternative lenders. And even if the experience is positive, they don’t get a chance to improve their situation with the corporate players.
Another problem with alternative lenders worth mentioning is the lack of transparency. The alternative lenders that aren’t regulated and obligated to report the portfolio contain potentially critical financial data about the borrowers. The alternative lending industry is growing fast. At some point, the lack of transparency may become an issue from the regulatory perspective when a significant part of the businesses can operate in the shade.
To learn about Prove’s identity solutions and how to accelerate revenue while mitigating fraud, schedule a demo today.
Keep reading
Prove's Developer Portal helps businesses balance strong security with a smooth user experience by providing developers with the tools they need to easily integrate identity verification into their applications, leading to streamlined onboarding and reduced fraud.
This blog explains the importance of identity verification APIs for secure and compliant applications, but also warns about common pitfalls in their implementation. It aims to guide developers on how to avoid these mistakes to ensure effective identity verification, improve user experience, and build trust in their digital platforms. The blog will delve into five specific mistakes and provide solutions, ultimately helping developers save time, reduce risks, and achieve better results.
With cyber threats on the rise, robust identity verification is crucial, but it needs to be balanced with a smooth user experience. Prove offers a solution that achieves both, using phone numbers for quick and accurate identity verification without added friction. This allows businesses to build trust and ensure security while offering a seamless user experience.
